This time the Section "Miscellaneous" agenda of the meeting of the Presidium of the Supreme Council was "hot". The tone was set by the head of the parliamentary committee on mandates, regulations and deputy ethics Gregory Dyachenko. He commented on the story of the First Pridnestrovian TV channel on February 29, in which conducted in the Russian State Duma meetings by Deputy Oleg Khorzhan were discussed. According to him, during the dialogue with the Russian parliamentarians, he also raised the subject of parliamentary immunity in general and "the refusal of the Pridnestrovian deputies to consent to criminal prosecution Chairman Grigoriopol town and district council Alexander Torpan", in particular.
Chairman of the Supreme Council Vadim Krasnoselsky expressed his position on the coverage of the legislative authority of the state TV channel.
He turned his attention to the speaker and urgent topic of parliamentary immunity, which today are often raised by voters.
Vice Speaker Galina Antyufeeva offered to illuminate the position of the Supreme Council on the question of immunity by preparing special report with a view to clarify to voters. She noted it talking about the statements of the deputy Oleg Khorzhan Supreme Council on TV.
Member of the Presidium of the Supreme Council, chairman of “The Obnovlenie” parliamentary faction Peter Pasat suggested incorrect positioning of Oleg Khorzhan as a member of the Supreme Council delegation, while the leadership of the legislature did not send him to business trip.