They must specify the reason of the ban

The Supreme Council during the plenary session supported a number of legislative initiatives developed by the deputies of the Committee on Legislation, Law Enforcement, Defense, Security, Peacekeeping, Protection of Citizens' Rights and Freedoms. One of them specifies the procedure for leaving one of the parents with an underage child outside the republic. Parliamentarians Galina Antyufeeva and Vitaly Kalin proposed amendments to the law, according to which, in case of disagreement of the second parent, it is necessary to indicate the reason for the ban.

In addition to the established obligation of the second parent to indicate the reason for the ban on the departure of the child, the law-in-draft specifies the duty of the authorized body to notify the other parent about it. Only after this, the migration service can allow or not allow the departure of a minor. If there is a dispute between the parents, it can be resolved only in court, noted the developers. Participating in the discussion of the law-in-draft, deputy of the Supreme Council Andrei Sipchenko drew the authors' attention to the need to provide for force majeure. For example, when a child needs urgent medical care outside the republic. Taking into account constructive proposals, the legislative initiative was adopted by the deputy corps in the first reading.

Another law-in-draft, prepared by the deputies of the profile committee concerns civil status acts. It was developed in connection with the need to eliminate contradictions in the legislation regarding the storage of records. The document provides for the obligation of all bodies, on the storage of which are the acts of books until 1944, to transfer them to the republican archive of the registry office. The authors of the initiative proposed to extend the period of storage of documents from 75 to 100 years. The legislative initiative passed the procedure of the first reading.