Timeliness is primarily

The Committee on Legislation supported the initiative of a group of deputies, which obliges the government to provide conclusions on legislations within thirty days. If the conclusion is not received on time, the Supreme Council has the right to consider the initiative without formalized opinion of the executive branch.

Chairman of the relevant committee Galina Antyufeeva fully supported the idea. More than a dozen reports were received for the law-in-draft. Most of them are positive. The President and government are against the adoption of the initiative. Parliamentarians, in turn, emphasized that the conclusion of the Government, indeed, important for making deputies’ decisions, but the documents should be received timely, and this mechanism must be secured at the legislative level.

Deputy Vitaly Kalin, supporting the initiative in fact, offered to follow the Russian way, and to require the presence of the conclusion on the law-in-draft when making the consideration, that is, the so-called zero reading. Galina Antyufeeva noted that move in this direction should be phased

As a result, the Committee decided to recommend the Plenary adoption in the first reading the package of draft laws amending the Constitution and the laws "On the Government of PMR" and "On the Rules of the Supreme Council of PMR". The period of time available to the Government to give opinions on draft laws is not conceptual. Dates have to be discussed in the second reading.